Peldesine
(Synonyms: BCX 34) 目录号 : GC61168
Peldesine(BCX34)是一种有效的，竞争性，可逆和口服活性的嘌呤核苷磷酸化酶(PNP)抑制剂，对人，大鼠和小鼠红细胞(RBC)PNP的IC50分别为36nM，5nM和32nM。Peldesine还是一种T细胞(T-cell)增殖抑制剂，IC50为800nM。Peldesine可用于皮肤T细胞淋巴瘤，牛皮癣和HIV感染的研究。
Cas No.:133432-71-0
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
;)
,-1-7$$$37316672.jpg');)
;)
;)
$$$36806353.jpg');)
;33(7)%EF%BC%9A546-561$$$37156877.jpg');)
;)
;)
;)
%201124-1138.$$$35908550.jpg');)
%20766-780.$$$37100057.jpg');)
%20418-432.$$$36893736.jpg');)
%EF%BC%9A-240-255.$$$35108512.jpg');)
533-545$$$36543525.jpg');)
%201-13.$$$36600053.jpg');)
;)
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >98.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Peldesine (BCX 34) is a potent, competitive, reversible and orally active purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) inhibitor with IC50s of 36 nM, 5 nM, and 32 nM for human, rat, and mouse red blood cell (RBC) PNP, respectively. Peldesine is also a T-cell proliferation inhibitor with an IC50 of 800 nM. Peldesine has the potential for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, psoriasis and HIV infection treatment[1][2][3][4].
Peldesine (BCX 34; 0-50 µM; 72 hours; Jurkat cells) could inhibit the T-cell proliferation completely at a concentration of less than 10 μM, in the presence of dGuo (10 μM). In contrast, the B-cell proliferation is not affected by Peldesine[1]. Peldesine (BCX 34) suppresses T-cell immune reaction in an IL-2-independent manner, and this means that Peldesine might affect a late phase rather than an early stage in T-cell activation[1].Peldesine also, in the presence but not in the absence of deoxyguanosine, inhibits human leukemia CCRF-CEM T-cell proliferation with an IC50 of 0.57 μM but not rat or mouse T-cell proliferation up to 30 μM[3]. Cell Proliferation Assay[1] Cell Line: Jurkat cells
Oral bioavailability of Peldesine in rats is 76%. Peldesine is orally active in elevating plasma inosine in rats (2-fold at 30 mg/kg), in suppressing ex vivo RBC PNP activity in rats (98% at 3 h. 100 mg/kg), and in suppressing ex vivo skin PNP in mice (39% at 3 h, 100 mg/kg)[3].
[1]. Wada Y, et al. BCX-34: a novel T-cell selective immunosuppressant: purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) inhibitor. Artif Organs. 1996 Aug;20(8):849-52. [2]. Duvic M, et al. A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of peldesine (BCX-34) cream as topical therapy for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001 Jun;44(6):940-7. [3]. Bantia S, et al. In vivo and in vitro pharmacologic activity of the purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor BCX-34: the role of GTP and dGTP. Immunopharmacology. 1996 Oct;35(1):53-63. [4]. New AIDS study suppresses T cells to stop viral growth. AIDS Alert. 1997 Jul;12(7):77-8.
| Cas No. | 133432-71-0 | SDF | |
| 别名 | BCX 34 | ||
| Canonical SMILES | O=C1C(NC=C2CC3=CC=CN=C3)=C2N=C(N)N1 | ||
| 分子式 | C12H11N5O | 分子量 | 241.25 |
| 溶解度 | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C | |
| General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液；一旦配成溶液，请分装保存，避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限：-80°C 储存时，请在 6 个月内使用，-20°C 储存时，请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度，请将管子加热至37℃，然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
| Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案：配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸：配备RT，或根据请求配备蓝冰。 | ||
| 制备储备液 | |||
 |
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg |
| 1 mM | 4.1451 mL | 20.7254 mL | 41.4508 mL |
| 5 mM | 0.829 mL | 4.1451 mL | 8.2902 mL |
| 10 mM | 0.4145 mL | 2.0725 mL | 4.1451 mL |
| 第一步：请输入基本实验信息（考虑到实验过程中的损耗，建议多配一只动物的药量） | ||||||||||
| 给药剂量 | mg/kg |  |
动物平均体重 | g | |
每只动物给药体积 | ul | |
动物数量 | 只 |
| 第二步：请输入动物体内配方组成（配方适用于不溶于水的药物；不同批次药物配方比例不同，请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方） | ||||||||||
| % DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
| 计算重置 | ||||||||||
计算结果:
工作液浓度： mg/ml；
DMSO母液配制方法： mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液（母液浓度 mg/mL，
体内配方配制方法：取 μL DMSO母液，加入 μL PEG300，混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80，混匀澄清后加入 μL saline，混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的；
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入，进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液，可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Interventions for mycosis fungoides
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD008946.PMID:32632956DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub3.
Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2012: we wanted to assess new trials, some of which investigated new interventions. Objectives: To assess the effects of interventions for MF in all stages of the disease. Search methods: We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS. We searched 2 trials registries for additional references. For adverse event outcomes, we undertook separate searches in MEDLINE in April, July and November 2017. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of local or systemic interventions for MF in adults with any stage of the disease compared with either another local or systemic intervention or with placebo. Data collection and analysis: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were improvement in health-related quality of life as defined by participants, and common adverse effects of the treatments. Key secondary outcomes were complete response (CR), defined as complete disappearance of all clinical evidence of disease, and objective response rate (ORR), defined as proportion of patients with a partial or complete response. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence and considered comparisons of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) light treatment as most important because this is first-line treatment for MF in most guidelines. Main results: This review includes 20 RCTs (1369 participants) covering a wide range of interventions. The following were assessed as either treatments or comparators: imiquimod, Peldesine, hypericin, mechlorethamine, nitrogen mustard and intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α) (topical applications); PUVA, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP: photochemotherapy), and visible light (light applications); acitretin, bexarotene, lenalidomide, methotrexate and vorinostat (oral agents); brentuximab vedotin; denileukin diftitox; mogamulizumab; chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, and vincristine; a combination of chemotherapy with electron beam radiation; subcutaneous injection of IFN-α; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor (parenteral systemics). Thirteen trials used an active comparator, five were placebo-controlled, and two compared an active operator to observation only. In 14 trials, participants had MF in clinical stages IA to IIB. All participants were treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, mainly in Europe, North America or Australia. Trials recruited both men and women, with more male participants overall. Trial duration varied from four weeks to 12 months, with one longer-term study lasting more than six years. We judged 16 trials as at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly performance bias (blinding of participants and investigators), attrition bias and reporting bias. None of our key comparisons measured quality of life, and the two studies that did presented no usable data. Eighteen studies reported common adverse effects of the treatments. Adverse effects ranged from mild symptoms to lethal complications depending upon the treatment type. More aggressive treatments like systemic chemotherapy generally resulted in more severe adverse effects. In the included studies, CR rates ranged from 0% to 83% (median 31%), and ORR ranged from 0% to 88% (median 47%). Five trials assessed PUVA treatment, alone or combined, summarised below. There may be little to no difference between intralesional IFN-α and PUVA compared with PUVA alone for 24 to 52 weeks in CR (risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87 to 1.31; 2 trials; 122 participants; low-certainty evidence). Common adverse events and ORR were not measured. One small cross-over trial found once-monthly ECP for six months may be less effective than twice-weekly PUVA for three months, reporting CR in two of eight participants and ORR in six of eight participants after PUVA, compared with no CR or ORR after ECP (very low-certainty evidence). Some participants reported mild nausea after PUVA but no numerical data were given. One participant in the ECP group withdrew due to hypotension. However, we are unsure of the results due to very low-certainty evidence. One trial comparing bexarotene plus PUVA versus PUVA alone for up to 16 weeks reported one case of photosensitivity in the bexarotene plus PUVA group compared to none in the PUVA-alone group (87 participants; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between bexarotene plus PUVA and PUVA alone in CR (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.80) and ORR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.44) (93 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial comparing subcutaneous IFN-α injections combined with either acitretin or PUVA for up to 48 weeks or until CR indicated there may be little to no difference in the common IFN-α adverse effect of flu-like symptoms (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.88; 82 participants). There may be lower CR with IFN-α and acitretin compared with IFN-α and PUVA (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.84; 82 participants) (both outcomes: low-certainty evidence). This trial did not measure ORR. One trial comparing PUVA maintenance treatment to no maintenance treatment, in participants who had already had CR, did report common adverse effects. However, the distribution was not evaluable. CR and OR were not assessable. The range of treatment options meant that rare adverse effects consequently occurred in a variety of organs. Authors' conclusions: There is a lack of high-certainty evidence to support decision making in the treatment of MF. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, missing data, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be reliably established on the basis of the included RCTs. PUVA is commonly recommended as first-line treatment for MF, and we did not find evidence to challenge this recommendation. There was an absence of evidence to support the use of intralesional IFN-α or bexarotene in people receiving PUVA and an absence of evidence to support the use of acitretin or ECP for treating MF. Future trials should compare the safety and efficacy of treatments to PUVA, as the current standard of care, and should measure quality of life and common adverse effects.
Interventions for mycosis fungoides
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD008946.PMID:22972128DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD008946.pub2.
Background: Mycosis fungoides is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time. Objectives: To assess the effects of interventions for mycosis fungoides in all stages of the disease. Search methods: We searched the following databases up to January 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2010), and LILACS (from 1982). We also checked reference lists of included studies for further references to relevant RCTs. We searched online trials registries for further references to unpublished trials and undertook a separate search for adverse effects of interventions for mycosis fungoides in non-RCTs in MEDLINE in May 2011. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for mycosis fungoides in people with any stage of the disease. At least 90% of participants in the trials must have been diagnosed with mycosis fungoides (Alibert-Bazin-type). Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed eligibility and methodological quality for each study and carried out data extraction. We resolved any disagreement by discussion. Primary outcomes were the impact on quality of life and the safety of interventions. When available, we reported on our secondary outcomes, which were the improvement or clearance of skin lesions, disease-free intervals, survival rates, relapse rates, and rare adverse effects. When possible, we combined homogeneous studies for meta-analysis. We used The Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of bias' tool to assess the internal validity of all included studies in six different domains. Main results: The review included 14 RCTs involving 675 participants, covering a wide range of interventions. Eleven of the included trials assessed participants in clinical stages IA to IIB only (please see Table 1 for definitions of these stages).Internal validity was considerably low in studies with a high or unclear risk of bias. The main reasons for this were low methodological quality or missing data, even after we contacted the study authors, and a mean dropout rate of 26% (0% to 72%). Study size was generally small with a minimum of 4 and a maximum of 103 participants. Only one study provided a long enough follow-up for reliable survival analysis.Included studies assessed topical treatments, such as imiquimod, Peldesine, hypericin, nitrogen mustard, as well as intralesional injections of interferon-α (IFN-α). The light therapies investigated included psoralen plus ultraviolet A light (PUVA), extracorporeal photopheresis (photochemotherapy), and visible light. Oral treatments included acitretin, bexarotene, and methotrexate. Treatment with parenteral systemic agents consisted of denileukin diftitox; a combination of chemotherapy and electron beam radiation; and intramuscular injections of active transfer factor. Nine studies evaluated therapies by using an active comparator; five were placebo-controlled RCTs.Twelve studies reported on common adverse effects, while only two assessed quality of life. None of these studies compared the health-related quality of life of participants undergoing different treatments. Most of the reported adverse effects were attributed to the interventions. Systemic treatments, and here in particular a combined therapeutic regimen of chemotherapy and electron beam, bexarotene, or denileukin diftitox, showed more adverse effects than topical or skin-directed treatments.In the included studies, clearance rates ranged from 0% to 83%, and improvement ranged from 0% to 88%. The meta-analysis combining the results of 2 trials comparing the effect of IFN-α and PUVA versus PUVA alone showed no significant difference in the relative risk of clearance: 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.31). None of the included studies demonstrated a significant increase in disease-free intervals, relapse, or overall survival. Authors' conclusions: This review identified trial evidence for a range of different topical and systemic interventions for mycosis fungoides. Because of substantial heterogeneity in design, small sample sizes, and low methodological quality, the comparative safety and efficacy of these interventions cannot be established on the basis of the included RCTs. Taking into account the possible serious adverse effects and the limited availability of efficacy data, topical and skin-directed treatments are recommended first, especially in the early stages of disease. More aggressive therapeutic regimens may show improvement or clearance of lesions, but they also result in more adverse effects; therefore, they are to be considered with caution. Larger studies with comparable, clearly-defined end points for all stages of mycosis fungoides, and a focus on safety, quality of life, and duration of remission as part of the outcome measures, are necessary.
Evaluation of creams and ointments as suitable formulations for Peldesine
Int J Pharm 2001 May 21;219(1-2):73-80.PMID:11337167DOI:10.1016/s0378-5173(01)00632-9.
In-vitro studies were conducted to study the efficacy of mixed and self-emulsifying creams and hydrophobic ointment formulations in delivering Peldesine (BCX-34) into and across cryopreserved human cadaver skin (HCS). Oil-in-water cream formulations, containing 1% w/w of radiolabeled C(14) BCX-34 and propylene glycol (PG), glycerin (GLY), isopropyl myristate (IPM), oleic acid (OA) and capric-caprylic esters (CE) were prepared. Petrolatum and lanolin based ointments were also prepared with PG. Sections of the HCS, 250 microm thick, were fitted to vertical Franz diffusion chambers containing a receptor medium of pH 7.4 phosphate buffer solution maintained at 37 degrees C. Using the finite dose technique, 4-6 mg of a formulation sample was applied to the epidermal surface of each section and drug diffusion was permitted for 12 and 24 h periods. The distribution of drug into the HCS epidermis, dermis and into the receptor medium was measured by scintillation spectroscopy. The results show good correlation of the calculated in-vitro values for flux and skin-vehicle partition coefficients against the observed amounts of drug detected in the HCS. The mixed emulsion cream formulation containing PG delivered higher amounts of drug into the skin when compared to the same formulation containing GLY cream. The self-emulsifying cream formulation containing IPM had a higher skin-vehicle partition coefficient and delivered more drug into the dermis when compared to those formulations that contained OA and CE. The petrolatum ointment delivered six times more drug into the epidermis than the lanolin ointment, and had higher skin-vehicle partition values. In conclusion, creams containing PG and petrolatum-base formulations would be suitable for BCX-34 dermal delivery.
Preformulation studies for the development of a parenteral liquid formulation of the immunomodulator, Peldesine
PDA J Pharm Sci Technol 1999 Nov-Dec;53(6):303-8.PMID:10754728doi
Peldesine (BCX-34) is a potent inhibitor of the enzyme purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP). The object of this study was to determine the preformulation parameters of BCX-34 and subsequently prepare a sterile liquid formulation for intravenous infusion. Ionization and solubility parameters were assessed prior to formulation development. Three pKa values of approximately 4.0, 5.2 and 10.3 were assigned for BCX-34. The pH-solubility profile showed an increase in solubility when the pH of the solution was less than the pKa1 value of 4.0 and when the pH was more than the pKa3 value of 10.3. BCX-34 has an octanol-water partition coefficient of approximately 7:1 (Log P = 0.8). The Van't Hoff temperature dependent solubility when measured over a range of 4-40 degrees C produced a heat of solution (delta Hc) of 7.68 kcal/mole. Based on these preformulation observations, two parenteral formulations containing 1 and 5 mg/mL of BCX-34 were prepared in an acidified saline solution and filled into 30 cc and 100 cc glass vials. Both formulation batches were sterile filtered, while only one 1 mg/mL batch was terminally autoclaved. The long-term stability of both solutions was performed and compared. Results of this study show that the drug product was stable. Following a screening study, Lactated Ringer's injection USP was selected as a suitable infusion medium for the dilution of the drug concentrate solutions.
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Peldesine (BCX-34), a purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor, following single and multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers
J Clin Pharmacol 2000 Apr;40(4):410-20.PMID:10761169DOI:10.1177/00912700022008991.
The pharmacokinetic parameters of Peldesine (BCX-34) were investigated after single and multiple oral doses in two groups of healthy adult volunteers. The pharmacodynamic elevation of endogenous inosine and 2'-deoxyguanosine was simultaneously monitored. The first group of 8 subjects received an intravenous dose (18 mg/m2) and five oral doses (30, 63, 108, 144, and 192 mg/m2) of drug. A second group of 12 subjects received 160 mg/m2 in four and in six divided doses orally. Serial blood samples and total urine outputs were collected during dosing and for at least 24 hours after the last dose was administered. One set of samples was analyzed using high-pressure liquid chromatography/ultraviolet (LC/UV) methods, validated for intact drug in human plasma and urine samples. Another set of samples was analyzed for the biomarkers, inosine and 2'-deoxyguanosine, using high-pressure LC with either mass spectrometry (MS) or electrochemical detection (EC) methods. The pharmacokinetic parameters of inosine and 2'-deoxyguanosine were calculated using noncompartmental methods and correlated against the pharmacokinetic parameters of BCX-34. For the single-dose study, the results exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range from 30 to 144 mg/m2. The calculated terminal half-life was 3.5 +/- 1.0 h, and the absolute bioavailability of the oral formulation was approximately 51%. Analysis of urine in the first 24 hours of collection accounted for approximately 82% of the absorbed intact drug. Evaluation of the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics indicated that steady-state blood concentrations were achieved by 24 hours when the drug was administered four or six times a day. A drug dose-related elevation of plasma 2'-deoxyguanosine was observed. This phenomenon was not seen with plasma inosine levels. However, analysis of urine samples showed an increase in inosine output with an increase in the drug dose. The calculated terminal half-life of inosine and 2'-deoxyguanosine was 15.3 +/- 1.8 h and 1.3 +/- 0.1 h, respectively.