Norethindrone acetate
(Synonyms: 醋酸炔诺酮; 19-Norethindrone acetate) 目录号 : GC36759Norethindrone acetate (19-Norethindrone acetate, NA) is a common synthetic hormone used in oral contraceptives. Norethindrone acetate is a well-tolerated, effective option to manage pain and bleeding for all stages of endometriosis.
Cas No.:51-98-9
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >99.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Norethindrone acetate (19-Norethindrone acetate, NA) is a common synthetic hormone used in oral contraceptives. Norethindrone acetate is a well-tolerated, effective option to manage pain and bleeding for all stages of endometriosis.
[1] W E Maier, J R Herman. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2001 Aug;34(1):53-61. [2] D J Kaser, et al. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Apr;25(2):105-108.
Cas No. | 51-98-9 | SDF | |
别名 | 醋酸炔诺酮; 19-Norethindrone acetate | ||
Canonical SMILES | C#C[C@]1(OC(C)=O)CC[C@@]2([H])[C@]3([H])CCC4=CC(CC[C@]4([H])[C@@]3([H])CC[C@]12C)=O | ||
分子式 | C22H28O3 | 分子量 | 340.46 |
溶解度 | DMSO: ≥ 100 mg/mL (293.72 mM); Water: 0.67 mg/mL (1.97 mM) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。 |
制备储备液 | |||
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 2.9372 mL | 14.686 mL | 29.372 mL |
5 mM | 0.5874 mL | 2.9372 mL | 5.8744 mL |
10 mM | 0.2937 mL | 1.4686 mL | 2.9372 mL |
第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量) | ||||||||||
给药剂量 | mg/kg | 动物平均体重 | g | 每只动物给药体积 | ul | 动物数量 | 只 | |||
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方) | ||||||||||
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
计算重置 |
计算结果:
工作液浓度: mg/ml;
DMSO母液配制方法: mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液(母液浓度 mg/mL,
体内配方配制方法:取 μL DMSO母液,加入 μL PEG300,混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80,混匀澄清后加入 μL saline,混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的;
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入,进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液,可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Treatment of Uterine Fibroid Symptoms with Relugolix Combination Therapy
N Engl J Med 2021 Feb 18;384(7):630-642.PMID:33596357DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2008283.
Background: Uterine fibroids are a common cause of heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Treatment with the combination of relugolix (an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-receptor antagonist), estradiol, and Norethindrone acetate, administered once daily, may have efficacy in women with uterine fibroids and heavy bleeding while avoiding hypoestrogenic effects. Methods: We conducted two replicate international, double-blind, 24-week, phase 3 trials involving women with fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive once-daily placebo, relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix, 1 mg of estradiol, and 0.5 mg of Norethindrone acetate), or delayed relugolix combination therapy (40 mg of relugolix monotherapy, followed by relugolix combination therapy, each for 12 weeks). The primary efficacy end point in each trial was the percentage of participants with a response (volume of menstrual blood loss <80 ml and a ≥50% reduction in volume from baseline) in the relugolix combination therapy group, as compared with the placebo group. Key secondary end points were amenorrhea, volume of menstrual blood loss, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, pain, fibroid volume, and uterine volume. Safety and bone mineral density were assessed. Results: A total of 388 women in trial L1 and 382 in trial L2 underwent randomization. A total of 73% of the participants in the relugolix combination therapy group in trial L1 and 71% of those in trial L2 had a response (primary end point), as compared with 19% and 15%, respectively, of those in the placebo groups (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Both relugolix combination therapy groups had significant improvements, as compared with the placebo groups, in six of seven key secondary end points, including measures of menstrual blood loss (including amenorrhea), pain, distress from bleeding and pelvic discomfort, anemia, and uterine volume, but not fibroid volume. The incidence of adverse events was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo. Bone mineral density was similar with relugolix combination therapy and placebo but decreased with relugolix monotherapy. Conclusions: Once-daily relugolix combination therapy resulted in a significant reduction in menstrual bleeding, as compared with placebo, and preserved bone mineral density in women with uterine fibroids. (Funded by Myovant Sciences; LIBERTY 1 [L1] and LIBERTY 2 [L2] ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03049735 and NCT03103087, respectively.).
HT update: spotlight on estradiol/Norethindrone acetate combination therapy
Clin Interv Aging 2008;3(1):9-16.PMID:18488874DOI:10.2147/cia.s1663.
Abstract: The goal ofpostmenopausal hormone therapy is to alleviate the symptoms that are associated with the loss of estrogen. Many formulations of estrogen and progestin are available, depending on the needs and circumstances of each individual woman. For postmenopausal women, the choice of whether or not to begin therapy requires knowledge of the risks and benefits of estrogen and/or progestin replacement. The purpose of this review is to describe the risks and benefits of hormonal therapy, focusing on estradiol/Norethindrone acetate combination therapy.
The hormonal profile of Norethindrone acetate: rationale for add-back therapy with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in women with endometriosis
Reprod Sci 2012 Jun;19(6):563-71.PMID:22457429DOI:10.1177/1933719112438061.
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are an effective treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. The use of hormonal add-back therapy can alleviate the hypoestrogenic symptoms associated with GnRHa therapy, while preserving therapeutic efficacy. Norethindrone acetate (NETA) is a unique progestin that has both estrogenic and androgenic properties and is effective as an add-back regimen without estrogen supplementation. Through its estrogenic activity, NETA exerts beneficial effects on bone mineral density and vasomotor symptoms in women treated with GnRHa. In addition, NETA exhibits strong endometrial antiproliferative effects, which may result in further benefits for the endometriosis patient population. However, NETA add-back may be associated with progestogenic side effects and may lower high-density lipoprotein due to androgenic activity. These effects must be balanced with the overall benefits of NETA add-back therapy.
Association of Progestogens and Venous Thromboembolism Among Women of Reproductive Age
Obstet Gynecol 2022 Sep 1;140(3):477-487.PMID:PMC9669089DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004896.
Objective: To evaluate associations between use of seven progestogens and incident acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) among women of reproductive age. Methods: This nested matched case-control study identified women aged 15-49 years from January 1, 2010, through October 8, 2018, in the IBM MarketScan databases, a nationwide sample of private insurance claims in the United States. After exclusions, 21,405 women with incident acute VTE (case group), identified by diagnosis codes, were matched 1:5 by year of birth and index date through risk set sampling to 107,025 women without prior VTE (control group). From lowest to highest systemic dose based on a modified hierarchy, progestogens studied were levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD), oral norethindrone, etonogestrel implant, oral progesterone, oral medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral Norethindrone acetate, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA). Conditional logistic regression models adjusted for 16 VTE risk factors were used to estimate odds ratios and 99% CIs for incident acute VTE associated with current progestogen use compared with nonuse. The primary analysis treated each progestogen as a binary exposure. Dose, which varied for oral formulations, and chronicity were explored separately. Significance was set at P <.01 to allow for multiple comparisons. Results: Current use of higher-dose progestogens was significantly associated with increased odds of VTE compared with nonuse (oral Norethindrone acetate: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.00, 99% CI 1.96-4.59; DMPA: aOR 2.37, 99% CI 1.95-2.88; and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate: aOR 1.98, 99% CI 1.41-2.80). Current use of other progestogens was not significantly different from nonuse (LNG-IUD, etonogestrel implant, and oral progesterone) or had reduced odds of VTE (oral norethindrone). Sensitivity analyses that assessed misclassification bias supported the primary findings. Conclusion: Among reproductive-aged women using one of seven progestogens, only use of Norethindrone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate-considered higher-dose progestogens-was significantly associated with increased odds of incident acute VTE. The roles of progestogen type, dose, and indication for use warrant further study.
Pharmacology and toxicology of ethinyl estradiol and Norethindrone acetate in experimental animals
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2001 Aug;34(1):53-61.PMID:11502156DOI:10.1006/rtph.2001.1483.
For over 30 years various combinations of synthetic estrogens and progestins have been used in oral contraceptive formulations. Ethinyl estradiol (EE) and Norethindrone acetate (NA) are common synthetic hormones used in oral contraceptives such as Loestrin, Brevicon, Ortho-Novum, Norlestrin, and Norinyl. In recent years these oral contraceptives have been considered for development in other therapeutic indications. Given the use of these agents for other clinical indications with different and larger target populations, an updated comprehensive review of the toxicology literature of estrogens and progestins is warranted. This review will summarize available data on the pharmacology and toxicology of estrogens and progestins with an emphasis on the specific synthetic hormones EE and NA. Ethinyl estradiol and Norethindrone acetate alone or in combination, possess low acute and chronic toxicity. In some studies, EE and/or NA increased the incidence of specific tumors in susceptible strains of rodents and dogs, but not monkeys. These agents are not teratogenic when given in combination. Alone EE and NA have clastogenic properties. Overall, the animal data demonstrates that long-term exposure to EE and NA formulations pose very little health risks to humans.