Home>>Analytical Standards>>Bentazepam

Bentazepam

(Synonyms: 苯他西泮,QM 6008; Thiadipone; Tiadipone) 目录号 : GC46917

An Analytical Reference Standard

Bentazepam Chemical Structure

Cas No.:29462-18-8

规格 价格 库存 购买数量
1 mg
¥1,113.00
现货
5 mg
¥5,019.00
现货

电话:400-920-5774 Email: sales@glpbio.cn

Customer Reviews

Based on customer reviews.

Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.

产品文档

Quality Control & SDS

View current batch:

产品描述

Bentazepam is an analytical reference standard categorized as a benzodiazepine.1 This product is intended for research and forensic applications.

1.Higueras, A., Sanmatias, J.J., Padial, E., et al.Bentazepam versus cloracepate in the treatment of anxiety disordersCurr. Ther. Res.52(1)46-52(1992)

Chemical Properties

Cas No. 29462-18-8 SDF
别名 苯他西泮,QM 6008; Thiadipone; Tiadipone
Canonical SMILES O=C1CN=C(C2=CC=CC=C2)C3=C(SC4=C3CCCC4)N1
分子式 C17H16N2OS 分子量 296.4
溶解度 DMF: 15mg/mL,DMSO: 15mg/mL,DMSO:PBS (pH 7.2) (1:3): 0.25mg/mL 储存条件 Store at -20°C
General tips 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。
储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。
为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。
Shipping Condition 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。

溶解性数据

制备储备液
1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 3.3738 mL 16.8691 mL 33.7382 mL
5 mM 0.6748 mL 3.3738 mL 6.7476 mL
10 mM 0.3374 mL 1.6869 mL 3.3738 mL
  • 摩尔浓度计算器

  • 稀释计算器

  • 分子量计算器

质量
=
浓度
x
体积
x
分子量
 
 
 
*在配置溶液时,请务必参考产品标签上、MSDS / COA(可在Glpbio的产品页面获得)批次特异的分子量使用本工具。

计算

动物体内配方计算器 (澄清溶液)

第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量)
给药剂量 mg/kg 动物平均体重 g 每只动物给药体积 ul 动物数量
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方)
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline
计算重置

Research Update

Open-loop feedback control of serum Bentazepam concentrations and Bayesian estimation in multiple dosage regimens in patients

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1991 Nov;29(11):457-62.PMID:1800395doi

The time course of serum levels of Bentazepam was studied in 10 patients receiving anxiolytic agent orally at a dose of 25 mg on multiple dosage regimens with dosage intervals of 8 and 12 h. Using the methods of "open-loop feedback control", no linear regression programs and Bayesian estimation, it was possible to establish the best estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters corresponding to the single-compartment model for each patient from all their data relating to the serum levels obtained after the first dose and after multiple dosing with different regimens. The application of the Kruskal Wallis test showed that there were only statistical differences for the absorption constant, determined with and without Bayesian estimation. However, no statistically significant differences were found on comparing the experimentally obtained serum levels with the corresponding theoretical values calculated independently for each patient from the parameters established with and without Bayesian estimation. As population pharmacokinetic parameters of Bentazepam, the following were established: Ka = 2.330 +/- 0.665 l/h; Vd = 1.209 +/- 0.546 l/Kg and Ke = 0.160 +/- 0.118 l/h, corresponding to a mean value for the elimination half-life of 4.33 h.

Chronic liver injury related to use of Bentazepam: an unusual instance of benzodiazepine hepatotoxicity

Dig Dis Sci 2000 Jul;45(7):1400-4.PMID:10961721DOI:10.1023/a:1005520523502.

Liver injury induced by benzodiazepines is rare and is classified as an unpredictable or idiosyncratic hepatotoxic reaction. Early reports indicated that in most cases the pattern of liver injury was cholestatic. We describe three patients with persistent increases in liver transaminase levels after several weeks of treatment with Bentazepam, a benzodiazepine marketed in Spain for anxiety disorders. In all cases withdrawal of the drug was followed by resolution of transaminase level abnormalities. A liver biopsy (done in one patient only) showed histological evidence of severe chronic active hepatitis. In conclusion, these findings, together with two previously published case reports, suggest that a benzodiazepine can cause chronic hepatitis and argue in favor of using liver function tests to monitor all patients taking Bentazepam.

Fluoxetine-associated stomatitis

Ann Pharmacother 1997 Dec;31(12):1478-80.PMID:9416385DOI:10.1177/106002809703101207.

Objective: To describe two cases of stomatitis related to fluoxetine given for the treatment of depression that were detected in the hospital emergency department. Data synthesis: Two women developed stomatitis after the intake of fluoxetine for the treatment of depression. One of the patients had six recurrent episodes of stomatitis without suspecting an association with fluoxetine. No other drugs were administered during these episodes. The second patient was treated concurrently with fluoxetine and Bentazepam. In both patients the lesion improved upon discontinuation of fluoxetine, even though the second patient continued to take a different benzodiazepine. Discussion: Stomatitis related to fluoxetine has not been previously reported in clinical trials or in the literature. According to the causal algorithm used by the Spanish Drug Surveillance Schemes, the first case constituted a defined adverse reaction and the second was probable. Conclusions: Our observations suggest that fluoxetine may be considered as a probable cause of stomatitis. The reporting of isolated cases of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) makes it possible to define the toxicity profile of recently marketed drugs such as selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors, including fluoxetine. Emphasis is placed on the potential role played by emergency departments in detecting ADRs.

Parametrization by non-linear regression and bayesian estimation of Bentazepam in a multiple dosage regimen in humans

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1987 Nov;25(11):627-32.PMID:3429066doi

The plasma levels of Bentazepam were determined by an HPLC technique in a total of 10 patients receiving the drug orally in pill form who were on a dosage regimen with the drug administered every 8, 12 or 24 h. Blood samples were taken three times following the administration of the first and last dose and at times, immediately after the administration of intermediate doses. The parameters corresponding to a one-compartment kinetic model were calculated in each patient by using all the data on plasma levels still corresponding to different administrations by non-linear regression and applying programs with homoscedastic, heteroscedastic and bayesian estimation. The absorption constant had mean values of 2.33, 2.18 and 2.75 h-1. The elimination constant proved to be equal to 0.10, 0.09 and 0.22 h-1 while for the apparent distribution volume mean values of 1.89, 2.89 and 0.80 l/kg were found with each of the estimation programs employed, respectively. The values found for each of the kinetic parameters and with each of the programs were subjected to the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test with a view to detecting the presence or absence of statistically significant differences. The discrimination of the program that yielded the best fit was performed by linear regression between the values found for the plasma calculations and those calculated theoretically at the same time with each of the programs.

[A pharmacovigilance study with Bentazepam in a sample of 1046 psychiatric outpatients]

Rev Med Univ Navarra 1990 Apr-Jun;34(2):80-8.PMID:1983365doi

A pharmacovigilance study was performed upon 1,046 ambulatory patients that have been treated in external psychiatric consultation with Bentazepam. The sample size made possible to detect with 99% of security the incidence higher to 5% secondary effects, as mouth dryness, somnolence, asthenia, gastralgias/dyspepsias, constipation and sickness. It has as well been possible to detect the most usual ways of coprescription, and the most frequent was with antidepressants drugs that undertook approximately 1/3 of the sample and that it was responsible for some of the secondary effects observed. The Bentazepam treatment cut down significatively the score mean in Hamilton scale for the anxiety after 10-15 days of treatment. According to an intention analysis a therapeutic profit was got in the 76.7% of the sample depending on medical criteria and the 74.0% on patient criteria after 20-30 days of the treatment. The results obtained are discussed in terms of the sample characteristics.