Home>>Signaling Pathways>> Neuroscience>> mAChR>>Talsaclidine

Talsaclidine Sale

目录号 : GC37731

Talsaclidine 是一种毒蕈碱激动剂,具有优先神经刺激特性。Talsaclidine 是 M1 亚型的完全激动剂,M2 和M3 亚型的部分激动剂。

Talsaclidine Chemical Structure

Cas No.:147025-53-4

规格 价格 库存 购买数量
1mg
¥2,070.00
现货
5mg
¥3,420.00
现货
10mg 待询 待询
50mg 待询 待询

电话:400-920-5774 Email: sales@glpbio.cn

Customer Reviews

Based on customer reviews.

Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.

产品文档

Quality Control & SDS

View current batch:

产品描述

Talsaclidine is a muscarinic agonist with preferential neuron-stimulating properties. Talsaclidine is a full agonist at the M1 subtype, and as a partial agonist at the M2 and M3 subtypes[1][2][3][4].

[1]. Ensinger HA, et al. WAL 2014--a muscarinic agonist with preferential neuron-stimulating properties. Life Sci. 1993;52(5-6):473-80. [2]. Wienrich M, et al. Pharmacodynamic profile of the M1 agonist talsaclidine in animals and man. Life Sci. 2001 Apr 27;68(22-23):2593-600. [3]. Walland A, et al. In vivo consequences of M1-receptor activation by talsaclidine. Life Sci. 1997;60(13-14):977-84. [4]. Walland A, et al. Compensation of muscarinic bronchial effects of talsaclidine by concomitant sympathetic activation in guinea pigs. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997 Jul 9;330(2-3):213-9.

Chemical Properties

Cas No. 147025-53-4 SDF
Canonical SMILES C#CCO[C@@H]1[C@@H]2CCN(CC2)C1
分子式 C10H15NO 分子量 165.23
溶解度 Soluble in DMSO 储存条件 Store at -20°C
General tips 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。
储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。
为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。
Shipping Condition 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。

溶解性数据

制备储备液
1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 6.0522 mL 30.2608 mL 60.5217 mL
5 mM 1.2104 mL 6.0522 mL 12.1043 mL
10 mM 0.6052 mL 3.0261 mL 6.0522 mL
  • 摩尔浓度计算器

  • 稀释计算器

  • 分子量计算器

质量
=
浓度
x
体积
x
分子量
 
 
 
*在配置溶液时,请务必参考产品标签上、MSDS / COA(可在Glpbio的产品页面获得)批次特异的分子量使用本工具。

计算

动物体内配方计算器 (澄清溶液)

第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量)
给药剂量 mg/kg 动物平均体重 g 每只动物给药体积 ul 动物数量
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方)
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline
计算重置

Research Update

Treatment with the selective muscarinic m1 agonist Talsaclidine decreases cerebrospinal fluid levels of A beta 42 in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Amyloid 2003 Mar;10(1):1-6.PMID:12762134DOI:10.3109/13506120308995249.

The amyloid beta-peptides A beta 40 and A beta 42 are highly amyloidogenic constituents of brain beta-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lowering their formation may be achieved by modulating the activities of proteases that cleave the amyloid precursor protein (A beta PP), including alpha- beta-, and gamma-secretases. Talsaclidine is a functionally selective muscarinic m1 agonist that stimulates non-amyloidogenic alpha-secretase processing in vitro. We compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of A beta 40 and A beta 42 measured by ELISA before and at the end of 4 weeks of treatment with Talsaclidine. The medication was administered in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized clinical study to 40 patients with AD. Talsaclidine (n = 34) decreased CSF levels of A beta 42 by a median of 19% (p < 0.001) as compared to baseline. The mean difference between CSF levels of A beta 42 before and after treatment with Talsaclidine (n = 34) was -46 +/- 73 (SD) pg/ml as compared to 0 +/- 8 (SD) pg/ml with placebo (n = 6) (p < 0.05). CSF levels of A beta 40 increased during treatment with placebo (n = 6) while they remained stable during treatment with Talsaclidine (n = 31) (1.118 +/- 1.710 ng/ml, and -0.170 +/- 0.967 ng/ml, respectively; p < 0.05). These data show that treatment with the m1 agonist Talsaclidine reduced A beta peptides, and particularly A beta 42, in AD patients, suggesting it as a potential amyloid lowering therapy of AD.

Memory-related task performance by aged rhesus monkeys administered the muscarinic M(1)-preferring agonist, Talsaclidine

Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002 Jul;162(3):292-300.PMID:12122487DOI:10.1007/s00213-002-1105-3.

Rationale: Muscarinic-acetylcholine receptor agonists are yet to be used clinically for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD) even though laboratory evidence continues to support the potential for such an approach. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the M(1)-preferring agonist Talsaclidine in aged monkeys for effects on working memory. Methods: Three doses (0.6, 1.2, and 2.4 mg/kg, PO) of Talsaclidine and two time intervals (45 min and 8 h) after drug administration were evaluated in seven aged rhesus macaques trained to perform a computer-assisted delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) task. The relative effectiveness of Talsaclidine was also compared with another M(1)-preferring agonist WAY-132983 that was previously studied in this laboratory. Results: Talsaclidine improved DMTS accuracy only during sessions initiated 8 h after administration of one of the doses (i.e. 0.6 mg/kg). The drug's enhanced effectiveness at the 8-h time point relative to the 45-min time point was surprising in view of the fact that plasma concentrations were highest 45 min after administration. A higher dose of Talsaclidine (4.7 mg/kg) resulted in side effects (lethargy and excessive drooling) in some animals. Individualized optimal doses of Talsaclidine were associated with 7.4% and 10.6% improvement in overall (all trials averaged) DMTS accuracy during the 45 min and 8 h post-administration sessions, respectively. Under similar experimental conditions WAY-132983 increased DMTS accuracy by up to 15.6% above control levels. Conclusion: Both Talsaclidine and WAY-132983 provide at least modest improvements in DMTS accuracy in aged monkeys at some doses; however, challenges remain regarding the achievement of an adequate level of efficacy and reliability while minimizing side effects with these compounds. The positive findings do, however, support further study of the potential use of direct muscarinic agonists in the treatment age-related disorders of memory function.

Pharmacokinetics of the M1-agonist Talsaclidine in mouse, rat, rabbit and monkey, and extrapolation to man

Xenobiotica 2000 Aug;30(8):797-813.PMID:11037112DOI:10.1080/00498250050119853.

1. Talsaclidine is an M1-agonist under development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. The aim of the study was to investigate the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of single intravenous and oral doses of [14C]-talsaclidine in mouse, rat, rabbit and monkey. Previous data in humans showed that the drug was mainly excreted into the urine as the unchanged parent drug. The hypothesis was tested if animal data of drugs, which are mainly excreted renally, could be extrapolated to human. 2. The apparent volume of distribution at steady-state (V(ss)) was comparable in all animal species (2-5 l x kg(-1)) indicating an extensive distribution of the drug into tissues. The plasma protein binding was low and comparable in all species including man (< or = 7%). Elimination in terms of clearance was rapid-to-moderate depending on the species. The total plasma clearance (Cl) decreased in the order: mouse (128 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1))> rat (73.9) > monkey (10.6). Urinary excretion is the dominant route of excretion (> or = 86%). 3. A good correlation was achieved with human and animal data in allometric scaling of CI and V(ss). This confirms the hypothesis that renal filtration is scalable over the species and, given a comparable protein binding, animal data is predictive for man.

Compensation of muscarinic bronchial effects of Talsaclidine by concomitant sympathetic activation in guinea pigs

Eur J Pharmacol 1997 Jul 9;330(2-3):213-9.PMID:9253956DOI:10.1016/s0014-2999(97)01011-x.

The aim of the present investigation was to determine the reasons why the muscarinic receptor agonist Talsaclidine (WAL 2014 FU, 1-azabicyclo[2.2.2] octane,3-(2-propynyloxy)-, (R)-,(E)-2-butenedioate) is devoid of bronchospastic effects in anaesthetized guinea pigs but causes contracture in isolated tracheal muscle from this species. Effects on airway resistance were assessed with a modified Konzett-Rossler method in guinea pigs anaesthetized with urethane. Intravenous injection of 1-64 mg/kg Talsaclidine did not cause substantial bronchospasm in control animals. After blockade of beta-adrenoceptors, the muscarinic receptor agonist induced dose-dependent bronchospasm which could be blocked by atropine. In despinalized animals and in animals with spinal transection, Talsaclidine was bronchospastic but ED50 values were higher and maximal effects were smaller than in intact animals after beta-adrenoceptor blockade. In adrenalectomized guinea pigs, Talsaclidine was nearly as bronchospastic as after blockade of beta-adrenoceptors. In contrast, the muscarinic ganglion stimulant McN-A-343, 4-(m-chlorophenylcarbamoyloxy)-2-butyn-trimethyl-ammonium chloride, (2-32 mg/kg i.v.), which has a muscarinic receptor profile similar to that of Talsaclidine, i.e., full muscarinic agonism and highest affinity at muscarinic M1 receptors, partial agonism at muscarinic M3 receptors, but in contrast to Talsaclidine does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier, caused dose-dependent bronchospasm in control animals. These results indicate that Talsaclidine has bronchospastic potential which, however, does not become evident in vivo because of functional antagonism via beta-adrenoceptors resulting from concomitant activation of the sympathetic nervous system in general and the adrenals in particular. It can be concluded that the unique profile of action of Talsaclidine is due to partial agonism at bronchial muscarinic M3 receptors, a prerequisite for susceptibility to functional antagonism, and to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier readily and to induce sympathetic activation as a result of full agonism at peripheral ganglionic and adrenal as well as central muscarinic M1 receptors.

Pharmacodynamic profile of the M1 agonist Talsaclidine in animals and man

Life Sci 2001 Apr 27;68(22-23):2593-600.PMID:11392631DOI:10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01057-8.

In functional pharmacological assays, Talsaclidine has been described as a functionally preferential M1 agonist with full intrinsic activity, and less pronounced effects at M2- and M3 receptors. In accordance with this, cholinomimetic central activation measured in rabbits by EEG recordings occurred at a 10 fold lower dose than that inducing predominantly M3-mediated side effects. This pharmacological profile is also reflected in the clinical situation: Both in healthy volunteers and in Alzheimer patients--unlike after unspecific receptor stimulation through cholinesterase inhibitors--the mainly M3-mediated gastrointestinal effects (like nausea and vomiting) were not dose-limiting. Rather, sweating and hypersalivation, mediated through muscarinic receptors, occurred dose-dependently and were finally dose-limiting. In contrast to Talsaclidine, sabcomeline had a less pronounced functional M1 selectivity in pharmacological assays. This was also shown in anaesthetized guinea pigs where sabcomeline alone induced bronchoconstriction, and in the rabbit EEG where central activation and cholinergic side effects occurred in the same dose range. Neither drug, however, showed convincing improvement of cognitive functions in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. This asks for a reassessment of the muscarinic hypothesis for the treatment of this disease.