Nuezhenidic acid
(Synonyms: 女贞子酸) 目录号 : GC36781Nuezhenidic acid 是从Ligustrum lucidum 中分离得到的,具有抑制流感病毒 A 的活性。
Cas No.:183238-67-7
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >98.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Nuezhenidic acid, isolated from the fruits of Ligustrum lucidum, posseses inhibitory activities against influenza A virus[1].
[1]. Pang X, et al. Secoiridoid analogues from the fruits of Ligustrum lucidum and their inhibitory activities against influenza A virus. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2018 May 15;28(9):1516-1519.
Cas No. | 183238-67-7 | SDF | |
别名 | 女贞子酸 | ||
Canonical SMILES | OC(CC1(C(C(C(OC)=O)=COC1O[C@@H]2O[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]2O)CO)CC(O)=O)O)=O | ||
分子式 | C17H24O14 | 分子量 | 452.36 |
溶解度 | Soluble in DMSO | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。 |
制备储备液 | |||
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg | |
1 mM | 2.2106 mL | 11.0531 mL | 22.1063 mL |
5 mM | 0.4421 mL | 2.2106 mL | 4.4213 mL |
10 mM | 0.2211 mL | 1.1053 mL | 2.2106 mL |
第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量) | ||||||||||
给药剂量 | mg/kg | 动物平均体重 | g | 每只动物给药体积 | ul | 动物数量 | 只 | |||
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方) | ||||||||||
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
计算重置 |
计算结果:
工作液浓度: mg/ml;
DMSO母液配制方法: mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液(母液浓度 mg/mL,
体内配方配制方法:取 μL DMSO母液,加入 μL PEG300,混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80,混匀澄清后加入 μL saline,混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的;
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入,进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液,可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Pharmacokinetic comparison of nine bioactive components in rat plasma following oral administration of raw and wine-processed Ligustri Lucidi Fructus by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry
J Sep Sci 2020 Nov;43(21):3995-4005.PMID:32864882DOI:10.1002/jssc.202000625.
An accurate and sensitive ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method was established and validated for the determination of nine bioactive compounds of Ligustri Lucidi Fructus in rat plasma. Separation was performed on Halo® C18 column with a mobile phase of acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid in water. The eluate was detected by multiple reaction monitoring scanning operating in the negative ionization mode. This assay method was validated for selectivity, linearity, intra- and interday precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effect, and stability, and all methodological parameters fulfilled the Food and Drug Administration criteria for bioanalytical validation. The established method was successfully applied to a comparative pharmacokinetic study of raw and wine-processed Ligustri Lucidi Fructus in rats for the first time. It was found that the AUC0-24 and Cmax value of salidroside, hydroxytyrosol, and Nuezhenidic acid were increased significantly after processing, while the AUC0-24 and Cmax value of oleoside 11-methyl ester, 1'''-O-β-d-glucosylformoside, specnuezhenide, G13, oleonuezhenide, and oleanolic acid were decreased, which suggested that processing affects the absorption and bioavailability of Ligustri Lucidi Fructus. The results might be valuable for the clinical reasonable application and understanding the processing mechanism of Ligustri Lucidi Fructus.
Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, and Kidney Distribution of Raw and Wine-Steamed Ligustri Lucidi Fructus Extracts in Diabetic Nephropathy Rats
Molecules 2023 Jan 12;28(2):791.PMID:36677849DOI:10.3390/molecules28020791.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and kidney distribution between Ligustri Lucidi Fructus (LLF) and wine-steamed Ligustri Lucidi Fructus (WLL) extracts in diabetic nephropathy (DN) rats. The DN rats were induced by high-fat-sugar diet (HFSD)/streptozotocin (STZ) regimen. For pharmacodynamics, the DN rats were treated with LLF and WLL extracts to assess the anti-diabetic nephropathy effects. For pharmacokinetics and kidney distribution, the concentrations of drugs (hydroxytyrosol, salidroside, Nuezhenidic acid, oleoside-11-methyl ester, specnuezhenide, 1‴-O-β-d-glucosylformoside, G13, and oleonuezhenide) were determined. Regarding the pharmacodynamics, LLF and WLL extracts decreased the levels of blood glucose, serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and 24-h urinary protein (24-h Upro) in DN rats. Furthermore, LLF and WLL extracts increased the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C); decreased the levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C); and reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) in DN rats. The anti-diabetic nephropathy effect of the WLL extract was better than that of the LLF extract. Regarding the pharmacokinetic and kidney tissue distribution, there were obvious differences in the eight ingredients between LLF and WLL extracts in DN rats. LLF and WLL extracts had protective effects on DN rats, while the WLL extract was better than the LLF extract regarding anti-diabetic nephropathy effects. The pharmacokinetic parameters and kidney distribution showed that wine-steaming could affect the absorption and distribution of the eight ingredients. The results provided a reasonable basis for the study of the clinical application and processing mechanism of LLF.