Elenbecestat
(Synonyms: E2609) 目录号 : GC64967
Elenbecestat (E2609) is a novel BACE1 inhibitor, demonstrating prolonged reductions in plasma beta-amyloid levels after single dosing.
Cas No.:1388651-30-6
Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.
;)
,-1-7$$$37316672.jpg');)
;)
;)
$$$36806353.jpg');)
;33(7)%EF%BC%9A546-561$$$37156877.jpg');)
;)
;)
;)
%201124-1138.$$$35908550.jpg');)
%20766-780.$$$37100057.jpg');)
%20418-432.$$$36893736.jpg');)
%EF%BC%9A-240-255.$$$35108512.jpg');)
533-545$$$36543525.jpg');)
%201-13.$$$36600053.jpg');)
;)
Quality Control & SDS
- View current batch:
- Purity: >99.00%
- COA (Certificate Of Analysis)
- SDS (Safety Data Sheet)
- Datasheet
Elenbecestat (E2609) is a novel BACE1 inhibitor, demonstrating prolonged reductions in plasma beta-amyloid levels after single dosing.
| Cas No. | 1388651-30-6 | SDF | Download SDF |
| 别名 | E2609 | ||
| 分子式 | C19H18F3N5O2S | 分子量 | 437.44 |
| 溶解度 | DMSO : ≥ 250 mg/mL (571.51 mM) | 储存条件 | Store at -20°C |
| General tips | 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液；一旦配成溶液，请分装保存，避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。 储备液的保存方式和期限：-80°C 储存时，请在 6 个月内使用，-20°C 储存时，请在 1 个月内使用。 为了提高溶解度，请将管子加热至37℃，然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。 |
||
| Shipping Condition | 评估样品解决方案：配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸：配备RT，或根据请求配备蓝冰。 | ||
| 制备储备液 | |||
 |
1 mg | 5 mg | 10 mg |
| 1 mM | 2.286 mL | 11.4301 mL | 22.8603 mL |
| 5 mM | 0.4572 mL | 2.286 mL | 4.5721 mL |
| 10 mM | 0.2286 mL | 1.143 mL | 2.286 mL |
| 第一步：请输入基本实验信息（考虑到实验过程中的损耗，建议多配一只动物的药量） | ||||||||||
| 给药剂量 | mg/kg |  |
动物平均体重 | g | |
每只动物给药体积 | ul | |
动物数量 | 只 |
| 第二步：请输入动物体内配方组成（配方适用于不溶于水的药物；不同批次药物配方比例不同，请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方） | ||||||||||
| % DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline | ||||||||||
| 计算重置 | ||||||||||
计算结果:
工作液浓度： mg/ml；
DMSO母液配制方法： mg 药物溶于 μL DMSO溶液（母液浓度 mg/mL，
体内配方配制方法：取 μL DMSO母液，加入 μL PEG300，混匀澄清后加入μL Tween 80，混匀澄清后加入 μL saline，混匀澄清。
1. 首先保证母液是澄清的；
2.
一定要按照顺序依次将溶剂加入，进行下一步操作之前必须保证上一步操作得到的是澄清的溶液，可采用涡旋、超声或水浴加热等物理方法助溶。
3. 以上所有助溶剂都可在 GlpBio 网站选购。
Amyloid and APOE Status of Screened Subjects in the Elenbecestat MissionAD Phase 3 Program
J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2021;8(2):218-223.PMID:33569570DOI:10.14283/jpad.2021.4.
Background/objectives: Elenbecestat, an oral BACE-1 inhibitor that has been shown to reduce Aβ levels in cerebrospinal fluid, was investigated in two global phase 3 studies in early AD. Here we report on differences observed in characteristics of APOE ε4 and amyloid positive subjects in the large screening cohort. Design: Screening was performed in 5 sequential tiers over a maximum of 80 days, as part of placebo controlled, double blind phase 3 studies. Setting: Subjects were evaluated at sites in 7 regions (29 countries). Participants: Overall, 9758 subjects were screened. Intervention: All screened subjects that were eligible received either placebo or 50 mg QID Elenbecestat post randomisation. Measurements: Gender, disease staging, APOE ε4 status, amyloid status, amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) and amyloid PET Centiloid (CL) values were determined for screened subjects; by country and region. Results: In this program, 44% of subjects were APOE ε4 positive. Frequency of females was similar in both APOE ε4 positive and negative groups. However, early mild AD subjects were slightly higher in the APOE ε4 positive group compared with the APOE ε4 negative group. 56% of subjects were amyloid positive. The mean age in the amyloid positive group was slightly higher than the amyloid negative group. The gender distribution was similar between amyloid groups. A lower number of mild cognitive impairment was observed in the amyloid positive group along with a higher number of early mild AD. APOE ε4 positive subjects were higher in amyloid positive group compared to the amyloid negative group. China had the lowest APOE ε4 and amyloid positivity rates with Western Europe and Oceania performing best. Subjects received florbetapir, florbetaben or flutemetamol amyloid PET tracer. Amyloid negative and positive subjects CL values were normally distributed around their respective means of 1.5 CL and 83 CL. However, there was an appreciable overlap in the 20-40 CL range. Conclusions: In this large cohort of cognitively impaired subjects, subject demographics characteristics were comparable regardless of APOE genotype or amyloid positivity. APOE ε4 positivity and amyloid positivity varied by country and by geographical region.
Selective Secretase Targeting for Alzheimer's Disease Therapy
J Alzheimers Dis 2021;81(1):1-17.PMID:33749645DOI:10.3233/JAD-201027.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with marked atrophy of the cerebral cortex and accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles. Amyloid plaques are formed by oligomers of amyloid-β (Aβ) in the brain, with a length of 42 and 40 amino acids. α-secretase cleaves amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP) producing the membrane-bound fragment CTFα and the soluble fragment sAβPPα with neuroprotective activity; β-secretase produces membrane-bound fragment CTFβ and a soluble fragment sAβPPβ. After α-secretase cleavage of AβPP, γ-secretase cleaves CTFα to produce the cytoplasmic fragment AICD and P3 in the non-amyloidogenic pathway. CTFβ is cleaved by γ-secretase producing AICD as well as Aβ in amyloidogenic pathways. In the last years, the study of natural products and synthetic compounds, such as α-secretase activity enhancers, β-secretase inhibitors (BACE-1), and γ-secretase activity modulators, have been the focus of pharmaceuticals and researchers. Drugs were improved regarding solubility, blood-brain barrier penetration, selectivity, and potency decreasing Aβ42. In this regard, BACE-1 inhibitors, such as Atabecestat, NB-360, Umibecestat, PF-06751979 Verubecestat, LY2886721, Lanabecestat, LY2811376 and Elenbecestat, were submitted to phase I-III clinical trials. However, inhibition of Aβ production did not recover cognitive functions or reverse disease progress. Novel strategies are being developed, aiming at a partial reduction of Aβ production, such as the development of γ-secretase modulators or α-secretase activity enhancers. Such therapeutic tools shall focus on slowing down or minimizing the progression of neuronal damage. Here, we summarize structures and activities of the latest compounds designed for AD treatment, with remarkable in vitro, in vivo, and clinical phase activities.
Investigational BACE inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease
Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2019 Nov;28(11):967-975.PMID:31661331DOI:10.1080/13543784.2019.1683160.
Introduction: The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) states that brain accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomers and soluble aggregates represents the major causal event of the disease. Several small organic molecules have been synthesized and developed to inhibit the enzyme (β-site amyloid precursor protein cleaving enzyme-1 or BACE1) whose action represents the rate-limiting step in Aβ production.Areas covered: We reviewed the pharmacology and clinical trials of major BACE1 inhibitors.Expert opinion: In transgenic mouse models of AD, BACE1 inhibitors dose-dependently lower Aβ levels in brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) but the evidence for attenuation or reversal cognitive or behavioral deficits is very scanty. In AD patients, BACE1 inhibitors robustly lower plasma and CSF Aβ levels and reduce brain plaques but without cognitive, clinical, or functional benefit. To date, seventeen BACE1 inhibitors have failed in double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with mild-to-moderate or prodromal AD, or in cognitively normal subjects at risk of developing AD. Several of these studies were prematurely interrupted due to toxicity or cognitive and behavioral worsening compared to placebo-treated patients. Elenbecestat, the last BACE1 inhibitor remaining in late clinical testing for AD, was recently discontinued due to safety concerns.
BACE1: A Key Regulator in Alzheimer's Disease Progression and Current Development of its Inhibitors
Curr Neuropharmacol 2022;20(6):1174-1193.PMID:34852746DOI:10.2174/1570159X19666211201094031.
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disease with no specific disease-modifying treatment. β-secretase (BACE1) is considered the potential and rationale target because it is involved in the rate-limiting step, which produces toxic Aβ42 peptides that leads to deposits in the form of amyloid plaques extracellularly, resulting in AD. Objective: This study aims to discuss the role and implications of BACE1 and its inhibitors in the management of AD. Methods: We have searched and collected the relevant quality work from PubMed using the following keywords "BACE1", BACE2", "inhibitors", and "Alzheimer's disease". In addition, we included the work which discusses the role of BACE1 in AD and the recent work on its inhibitors. Results: In this review, we have discussed the importance of BACE1 in regulating AD progression and the current development of BACE1 inhibitors. However, the development of a BACE1 inhibitor is very challenging due to the large active site of BACE1. Nevertheless, some of the BACE1 inhibitors have managed to enter advanced phases of clinical trials, such as MK-8931 (Verubecestat), E2609 (Elenbecestat), AZD3293 (Lanabecestat), and JNJ-54861911 (Atabecestat). This review also sheds light on the prospect of BACE1 inhibitors as the most effective therapeutic approach in delaying or preventing AD progression. Conclusion: BACE1 is involved in the progression of AD. The current ongoing or failed clinical trials may help understand the role of BACE1 inhibition in regulating the Aβ load and cognitive status of AD patients.
Increasing the Cognitive Screening Efficiency of Global Phase III Trials in Early Alzheimer Disease: The Cognitive Task Force
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2022 Jul-Sep;36(3):185-191.PMID:35622461DOI:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000508.
Purpose: A Cognitive Task Force (CTF) was established for the MissionAD program with the aim of reducing the screen failure (SF) rate to ∼30% and thereby reduce unnecessary subject burden, site burden, and excess trial costs. Methods/subjects: The MissionAD program consisted of 2 global phase 3 studies evaluating the BACE inhibitor Elenbecestat in subjects with early Alzheimer disease. The CTF monitored and engaged with MissionAD clinical sites to provide support through collegial discussions to maximize the efficiency of the preconsent recruitment phase. Results: The CTF significantly improved cognitive screening efficiency in the MissionAD program, with a 24% decline in cognitive SF rate for the sites that the CTF contacted. The study-wide 11.5% reduction in cognitive SF rates were likely further driven by wider country-level initiatives in which CTF members held CTF-specific Investigator meetings with the recruitment staff, speaking to all sites on a country level regardless of their recruitment performance. Conclusions: The establishment of a CTF to support efficient cognitive screening is highly recommended for future Alzheimer disease studies. Additional benefits included improved site relationships, increased engagement in MissionAD and access to a group of cognitive experts for consulting, with a focus on achieving more efficient trial recruitment.