Home>>Signaling Pathways>> Others>> Others>>Diphencyprone

Diphencyprone Sale

(Synonyms: 二苯基环丙烯酮; Diphencyprone) 目录号 : GC45435

A contact sensitizing agent

Diphencyprone Chemical Structure

Cas No.:886-38-4

规格 价格 库存 购买数量
500mg
¥445.00
现货
1g
¥754.00
现货
5g
¥2,449.00
现货
10g
¥4,454.00
现货

电话:400-920-5774 Email: sales@glpbio.cn

Customer Reviews

Based on customer reviews.

Sample solution is provided at 25 µL, 10mM.

产品文档

Quality Control & SDS

View current batch:

产品描述

Diphencyprone (DCP) is a contact sensitizing agent.1,2,3 Pretreatment with DCP reduces symptom severity in a mouse model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) induced by myelin basic protein (1-10) (MBP1-10).1 It enhances IL-10 production and antigen-specific IgG2a antibody responses and reduces anaphylaxis and asthma induced by ovalbumin in mice when administered during ovalbumin immunization at a concentration of 1% v/v.2 Topical administration of DCP increases intrafollicular CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, reduces upper dermal inflammation, and stimulates hair growth in the C3H/HeJ mouse model of alopecia areta.3 Formulations containing DCP have been used in the treatment of alopecia areta.

References
1. Meister, M., Tounsi, A., Gaffal, E., et al. Self-antigen presentation by keratinocytes in the inflamed adult skin modulates T-cell auto-reactivity. J. Invest. Dermatol. 135(8), 1996-2004 (2015).
2. von Moos, S., Johansen, P., Waeckerle-Men, Y., et al. The contact sensitizer diphenylcyclopropenone has adjuvant properties in mice and potential application in epicutaneous immunotherapy. Allergy 67(5), 638-646 (2012).
3. Shapiro, J., Sundberg, J.P., Bissonnette, R.P., et al. Alopecia areata-like hair loss in C3H/HeJ mice and DEBR rats can be reversed using topical diphencyprone. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 4(3), 239 (1999).

Chemical Properties

Cas No. 886-38-4 SDF
别名 二苯基环丙烯酮; Diphencyprone
Canonical SMILES O=C1C(C2=CC=CC=C2)=C1C3=CC=CC=C3
分子式 C15H10O 分子量 206.2
溶解度 DMF: 20 mg/ml,DMSO: 20 mg/ml,DMSO:PBS (pH 7.2) (1:1): 0.5 mg/ml,Ethanol: 14 mg/ml 储存条件 Store at -20°C
General tips 请根据产品在不同溶剂中的溶解度选择合适的溶剂配制储备液;一旦配成溶液,请分装保存,避免反复冻融造成的产品失效。
储备液的保存方式和期限:-80°C 储存时,请在 6 个月内使用,-20°C 储存时,请在 1 个月内使用。
为了提高溶解度,请将管子加热至37℃,然后在超声波浴中震荡一段时间。
Shipping Condition 评估样品解决方案:配备蓝冰进行发货。所有其他可用尺寸:配备RT,或根据请求配备蓝冰。

溶解性数据

制备储备液
1 mg 5 mg 10 mg
1 mM 4.8497 mL 24.2483 mL 48.4966 mL
5 mM 0.9699 mL 4.8497 mL 9.6993 mL
10 mM 0.485 mL 2.4248 mL 4.8497 mL
  • 摩尔浓度计算器

  • 稀释计算器

  • 分子量计算器

质量
=
浓度
x
体积
x
分子量
 
 
 
*在配置溶液时,请务必参考产品标签上、MSDS / COA(可在Glpbio的产品页面获得)批次特异的分子量使用本工具。

计算

动物体内配方计算器 (澄清溶液)

第一步:请输入基本实验信息(考虑到实验过程中的损耗,建议多配一只动物的药量)
给药剂量 mg/kg 动物平均体重 g 每只动物给药体积 ul 动物数量
第二步:请输入动物体内配方组成(配方适用于不溶于水的药物;不同批次药物配方比例不同,请联系GLPBIO为您提供正确的澄清溶液配方)
% DMSO % % Tween 80 % saline
计算重置

Research Update

The efficacy of Diphencyprone immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous warts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Dermatolog Treat 2021 Sep;32(6):658-662.PMID:31679413DOI:10.1080/09546634.2019.1688230.

Background: Cutaneous warts, a common skin condition, may resolve spontaneously or become recalcitrant. Diphencyprone has been shown by many studies to have efficacy in treating warts, with varied results. Objectives: We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the cure rate following the use of Diphencyprone immunotherapy as a cutaneous wart treatment. Materials and methods: The databases of Medline, PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched for prospective and retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials reporting a cure rate for Diphencyprone immunotherapy between 1984 and 2018. The Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (Biostat Inc) was used to perform a meta-analysis of the Diphencyprone pool efficacy. Results: A total of 153 studies were obtained by searching the databases. After screening for eligibility, 14 studies were included (6 prospective studies, 4 retrospective studies, 3 randomized controlled trials, and 1 case report), representing a total of 851 patients. The random-effects pooled efficacy for Diphencyprone was 75.5% (95% CI, 64.6%-83.9%; I2 = 87%). Conclusions: Diphencyprone immunotherapy has a high efficacy to cure warts. This method may be used as an adjunctive modality for the treatment of warts in cases of conventional treatment failure.

Topical immunotherapy with Diphencyprone for in transit and cutaneously metastatic melanoma

J Surg Oncol 2014 Mar;109(4):308-13.PMID:24522938DOI:10.1002/jso.23506.

Topical Diphencyprone (DPCP) can be used to treat in transit and cutaneously metastastatic melanoma. To date, 50 patients have received DPCP therapy for at least 1 month at our institution, with complete clearance of cutaneous disease in 46% and partial response in a further 38% of patients. Topical immunotherapy with DPCP is inexpensive and well-tolerated and should be considered in patients with skin metastases unsuitable for or refractory to other forms of therapy.

Imiquimod-enhanced immunotherapy with Diphencyprone for patients with alopecia areata

Dermatol Ther 2022 Jul;35(7):e15516.PMID:35421278DOI:10.1111/dth.15516.

Topical immunotherapy with dyphencyprone (DPCP) is widely used in patients with alopecia areata (AA). It can produce a contact dermatitis that is believed to decrease Th1 response, predominant in AA. It has been shown that imiquimod (IMQ), a topical immunomodulator drug, can produce sensitization to DPCP in patients that do not show signs of contact dermatitis when exposed to DPCP. Nevertheless, there is no evidence as to whether it can improve DPCP efficacy in already sensitized patients. We present a series of 9 patients, (7 females [77%] and 2 males [22%]) with a mean age of 38.4 years (range, 19-60 years), successfully sensitized to DPCP, that were treated with a combination of DPCP and IMQ. The mean SALT (Severity of Alopecia Tool) score before adding IMQ was 43.3 (range, 10-60), and the mean number of months of DPCP use prior to the addition of IMQ was 6.8 (range 0-10). After adding IMQ to their DPCP treatment, 77% of the patients had further improvement, with a mean SALT reduction of 13.3 (range, [-50] - 40), and a mean duration of response of 5.2 months. No adverse effects were reported. According to this data, we believe that the combination of DPCP and IMQ can be a promising way of improving the efficacy of contact immunotherapy in AA, and requires further study.

Topical treatments for cutaneous warts

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001781.PMID:22972052DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001781.pub3.

Background: Viral warts are a common skin condition, which can range in severity from a minor nuisance that resolve spontaneously to a troublesome, chronic condition. Many different topical treatments are available. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of local treatments for cutaneous non-genital warts in healthy, immunocompetent adults and children. Search methods: We updated our searches of the following databases to May 2011: the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (from 2005), EMBASE (from 2010), AMED (from 1985), LILACS (from 1982), and CINAHL (from 1981). We searched reference lists of articles and online trials registries for ongoing trials. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of topical treatments for cutaneous non-genital warts. Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently selected trials and extracted data; a third author resolved any disagreements. Main results: We included 85 trials involving a total of 8815 randomised participants (26 new studies were included in this update). There was a wide range of different treatments and a variety of trial designs. Many of the studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in one or more areas of trial design.Trials of salicylic acid (SA) versus placebo showed that the former significantly increased the chance of clearance of warts at all sites (RR (risk ratio) 1.56, 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.20 to 2.03). Subgroup analysis for different sites, hands (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.43 to 5.01) and feet (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.55), suggested it might be more effective for hands than feet.A meta-analysis of cryotherapy versus placebo for warts at all sites favoured neither intervention nor control (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.65 to 3.23). Subgroup analysis for different sites, hands (RR 2.63, 95% CI 0.43 to 15.94) and feet (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.07), again suggested better outcomes for hands than feet. One trial showed cryotherapy to be better than both placebo and SA, but only for hand warts.There was no significant difference in cure rates between cryotherapy at 2-, 3-, and 4-weekly intervals.Aggressive cryotherapy appeared more effective than gentle cryotherapy (RR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.15), but with increased adverse effects.Meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference in effectiveness between cryotherapy and SA at all sites (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.71) or in subgroup analyses for hands and feet.Two trials with 328 participants showed that SA and cryotherapy combined appeared more effective than SA alone (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.43).The benefit of intralesional bleomycin remains uncertain as the evidence was inconsistent. The most informative trial with 31 participants showed no significant difference in cure rate between bleomycin and saline injections (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.78).Dinitrochlorobenzene was more than twice as effective as placebo in 2 trials with 80 participants (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.26).Two trials of clear duct tape with 193 participants demonstrated no advantage over placebo (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.51 to 4.05).We could not combine data from trials of the following treatments: intralesional 5-fluorouracil, topical zinc, silver nitrate (which demonstrated possible beneficial effects), topical 5-fluorouracil, pulsed dye laser, photodynamic therapy, 80% phenol, 5% imiquimod cream, intralesional antigen, and topical alpha-lactalbumin-oleic acid (which showed no advantage over placebo).We did not identify any RCTs that evaluated surgery (curettage, excision), formaldehyde, podophyllotoxin, cantharidin, Diphencyprone, or squaric acid dibutylester. Authors' conclusions: Data from two new trials comparing SA and cryotherapy have allowed a better appraisal of their effectiveness. The evidence remains more consistent for SA, but only shows a modest therapeutic effect. Overall, trials comparing cryotherapy with placebo showed no significant difference in effectiveness, but the same was also true for trials comparing cryotherapy with SA. Only one trial showed cryotherapy to be better than both SA and placebo, and this was only for hand warts. Adverse effects, such as pain, blistering, and scarring, were not consistently reported but are probably more common with cryotherapy.None of the other reviewed treatments appeared safer or more effective than SA and cryotherapy. Two trials of clear duct tape demonstrated no advantage over placebo. Dinitrochlorobenzene (and possibly other similar contact sensitisers) may be useful for the treatment of refractory warts.

Diphencyprone as a therapeutic option in cutaneous metastasis of melanoma. A single-institution experience

An Bras Dermatol 2018 Mar;93(2):299-301.PMID:29723355DOI:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20187162.

Diphencyprone has been reported as a local immunotherapy for cutaneous melanoma metastases. We aim to report cases of melanoma patients treated with Diphencyprone in a single Brazilian institution and highlight their outcomes. Since 2012, we have treated 16 melanoma patients with cutaneous metastases with topical Diphencyprone. To date, we have had 37.5% of complete response, 25% of partial responses, and 31.25% patients without any response. Treatment was well tolerated and local toxicity was easily controlled. We believe topical Diphencyprone is a feasible treatment that can be another option for treating melanoma patients, especially in cases of in-transit or extensive disease.